KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW
KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW
KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW
KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW KAW
index take action news press text field here
blank
basics
vulnerable populations
in depth
for consumers
the campaign
resources
contact us
sitemap
home

the european experience
In 1986, in response to pressure from farmers and consumers, Sweden became the first country to ban outright the use of antibiotics as growth promoters, i.e. antibiotics put in feed simply to make the animals put on weight faster and more efficiently. Denmark also instituted a voluntary ban on all antibiotic growth promoters beginning in February 1998 and a national tax on them in September 1998. Both countries now require a veterinarian's prescription for all remaining uses of antibiotics in livestock.

As of 1998, the European Union, of which Sweden and Denmark are members, prohibited use as growth promoters of all antibiotics used in human medicine; only four antibiotics not used in human medicine were able to be used without prescription in agriculture in the EU after the ban was put into place. Effective January 1, 2006, however, following the advice of the EU's Scientific Steering Committee, the four remaining antibiotic growth promoters were banned (namely monensin, salinomycin, avilamycin, and flavophospholipol). The ban did not affect drugs used to treat illness in animals though the EU is currently considering proposals to extend its ban on growth promotion to include all antibiotics. By contrast, in the U.S., no prescriptions are required for the vast majority of antibiotics used in agriculture. Several of the 17 antibiotics used to promote livestock growth are identical, or nearly so, to those used to treat sick people.

Where bans exist on the use of antibiotics as growth promotants, such as in Sweden and Denmark, meat producers continue to thrive. They've adapted, by modifying the diet of animals, and by improving animal husbandry to decrease the risk of infection. Of course, antibiotics continue to be available by prescription to treat animals that are sick.

In fact, a World Health Organization (WHO) expert panel concluded that Denmark's phaseout of routine antibiotics in livestock and poultry has protected health and not hurt farmers. The panel found that the phaseout led to an overall drop of 54% in use of antibiotics for food and "dramatically reduced" levels or resistant bacteria in animals.

Below are several available resources that provide more information on the European experience with responsible use of antibiotics in agriculture. Please see the "European Experience" category in Resources, for a comprehensive selection of relevant documents.